首页> 外文OA文献 >Right ventricular systolic function and mechanical dispersion identify patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.
【2h】

Right ventricular systolic function and mechanical dispersion identify patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

机译:右心室收缩功能和机械分散识别致心律失常性右心室心肌病患者。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE: To assess right ventricular (RV) regional and global systolic function using feature tracking (FT) in patients with a definite diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and to investigate if changes in strain amplitude and mechanical dispersion indicate a propensity for arrhythmia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients fulfilling Task Force Criteria for ARVC and 24 healthy volunteers underwent MR at 1·5 Tesla. Steady-state free precession cine of long-axis slices and a short-axis stack of the RV was acquired. Segmental longitudinal systolic strain amplitude and time-to-peak (TTP) strain were measured in the four- and two-chamber views of the RV. RESULTS: Compared to controls, patients with ARVC had lower RV ejection fraction (RVEF), (53% vs 57%, P = 0·012) and lower longitudinal strain amplitude in the RV free wall (-20·6 vs -26·3%, P = 0·014) and in the basal part of the RV (-22·8 vs -31·7%, P<0·001). Mechanical dispersion, defined as the standard deviation (SD) of TTP of RV segments, was larger in patients with ARVC (48 ms [21-74] vs 35 ms [13-66 ms], P = 0·02). Patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or non-sustained VT had lower RVEF (46% vs 55%, P = 0·008), but did not have significantly lower RV strain amplitude (-19·5% vs 21·0%, P = 0·073) and no signs of mechanical dispersion (49 ms vs 48 ms, P = 0·861) compared to patients without arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: ARVC patients had lower longitudinal absolute strain amplitude in basal RV segments and increased mechanical dispersion compared to healthy volunteers, but the presence of mechanical dispersion was not predictive of ventricular arrhythmia.
机译:目的:使用特征跟踪(FT)评估确诊为致心律失常性右室心肌病(ARVC)的患者的右心室(RV)区域和整体收缩功能,并调查应变幅度和机械离散度的变化是否表明心律失常的倾向。材料与方法:符合ARVC工作组标准的27位患者和24位健康志愿者在1·5特斯拉接受了MR。获得了长轴切片和短轴堆叠的RV的稳态自由进动电影。在RV的四腔和两腔视图中测量节段性纵向收缩期应变幅度和峰值时间(TTP)应变。结果:与对照组相比,ARVC患者的RV射血分数(RVEF)较低,分别为(53%vs 57%,P = 0·012)和较低的RV无壁纵向应变幅度(-20·6 vs -26· 3%,P = 0·014)和右室的基础部分(-22·8对-31·7%,P <0·001)。在ARVC患者中,机械离散度定义为RV节段TTP的标准偏差(SD),较大(48 ms [21-74] vs 35 ms [13-66 ms],P = 0·02)。室性心动过速(VT)或非持续性VT患者的RVEF较低(46%vs 55%,P = 0·008),但RV应变幅度没有明显降低(-19·5%vs 21·0%,与没有心律不齐的患者相比,P = 0·073)且没有机械分散迹象(49 ms vs 48 ms,P = 0·861)。结论:与健康志愿者相比,ARVC患者在基础RV区段中具有较低的纵向绝对应变幅度,并且机械分散性增加,但是机械分散性的存在并不能预测室性心律失常。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号